Donate Button
Follow us...

COURT DECISION

Buckley v. Valeo
1976

Full name: Buckley v. Valeo



JUSTICES IN MAJORITY
Harry Blackmun
William J. Brennan, Jr.
Thurgood Marshall
Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
William Rehnquist
Potter Stewart
Byron White

DISSENTING
Warren E. Burger

NOT PARTICIPATING
John Paul Stevens

Note: Court justices do not represent any political party. The color of each judge's name represents the political party of the president who appointed the judge.

Click here for a list of all Supreme Court justices



Related Issues

Understanding Election Campaign Financing


Related Bills

Federal Election Campaign Act

1971 (S-382)

Summary

The Supreme Court ruled that Congress cannot limit the amount of money Congressional candidates can spend on their campaigns.

What was the case about?

In 1975 Sen. James L. Buckley and Sen. Eugene McCarthy sued Francis R. Valeo - Secretary of the Senate and ex officio member of the Federal Elections Commission (FEC).

They charged that the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) and Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act were unconstitutional.

How the Supreme Court ruled

The decision...

o Upheld contribution limits, saying they serve the government's interest in safeguarding the integrity of elections.

o Overturned expenditure limits, saying that spending limits restrict the quantity of campaign speech by candidates. The court said that spending limits still could be imposed on candidates who accept public funding for their campaigns.

                   Tell us if we goofed                                                  Copyright